TenantSage™ evaluates how your enterprise AI system handles retrieval-layer enforcement — and delivers a written governance report identifying where your architecture is sound, and where it carries risk.
TenantSage™ is a framework authority — not a systems integrator. The Governance Architecture Review is the only service we offer publicly. It is an independent, expert evaluation of how your AI retrieval layer handles governance — and where it does not.
We examine your architecture against the TenantSage Standard™: a defined set of governance properties that retrieval-layer systems should demonstrate to support legal defensibility in regulated enterprise environments.
The output is a written report you can take to your engineering team, your board, your legal counsel, or your auditor.
This is an architecture review. We assess design, structure, and governance properties against a defined standard. No access to production systems required.
Not a penetration test. We do not run exploit scans or vulnerability assessments. We evaluate governance logic, not attack surface.
Not a system build. We do not implement, configure, or deploy systems on your behalf as part of this engagement.
Not a compliance certification. The report informs compliance readiness. It is not a formal certification or legal opinion.
Not a legal service. TenantSage™ is not a law firm. The report does not constitute legal advice.
Every Governance Architecture Review examines four defined domains. Findings in each are graded and reported in writing.
How and where governance rules are applied during query execution. We assess whether enforcement occurs before, during, or after retrieval — and whether any post-retrieval filtering path exists.
Whether tenant boundaries are structurally enforced or rely on application-layer logic. We examine data separation, family scoping, and cross-tenant access risk.
Whether governance and retrieval can be separated — intentionally or through misconfiguration. Decoupled systems create bypass pathways that are often invisible until an incident occurs.
A structured written report delivered to your nominated stakeholders. The report is designed to be actionable for engineering teams and readable for legal counsel, risk officers, and boards.
The written governance report is the sole deliverable. It is structured to serve multiple audiences — from CTO to general counsel — without requiring technical translation.
Overall risk tier (Low / Elevated / High), key findings in plain language, and a recommended course of action.
Detailed findings across all four evaluation domains, with supporting observations and evidence references.
Each identified risk is classified by severity and type — structural, configurational, or procedural.
A scorecard measuring your architecture's alignment against the TenantSage Standard™ governance benchmark.
For each identified risk, a recommended architectural remediation path — not implementation, but directional guidance.
ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE — NOT ACTUAL CLIENT DATA
The Governance Architecture Review is priced as enterprise advisory engagement. Pricing reflects expertise and the value of a written governance finding — not hours or seat count.
The review is conducted via architecture documentation, design specifications, and structured technical discussion. No access to live systems or production data is required.
All engagements require a mutual NDA prior to any architecture disclosure. This protects both parties. Execute NDA online →
The written governance report is delivered to the client and is their property. TenantSage™ retains no right to publish findings without explicit written consent.
Every review strengthens TenantSage's position as the governance standard. We do not become embedded in client systems — we evaluate against our standard and maintain independence.
Each engagement applies and refines the TenantSage governance method in a real-world context — without requiring product delivery or system implementation.
Written reports, under NDA, form an evidence base for future licensing and Standard™ development — building credibility with investors, auditors, and enterprise procurement.
Submit your review request via email. We confirm scope, timeline, and fee within 2 business days. No commitment required at this stage.
Mutual NDA is executed. Engagement fee is confirmed. Architecture documentation and design specifications are shared by the client under NDA protection.
TenantSage evaluates the provided documentation across four domains. One structured technical session (up to 90 minutes) may be held to clarify architecture decisions.
The written governance report is delivered to nominated stakeholders in PDF format. All findings are presented with supporting observations.
A single follow-up session (up to 60 minutes) is included to walk stakeholders through findings and answer clarifying questions. No additional material is produced in this session.
The only way to know is an independent review against a defined standard. That is what we provide.